Content Writer India

 Online Writing - Web Writing Myths & realities

About Contentwriter | Contact Us | Stories | Poetry | Musings | Jobs | Contribute Your Articles| Collection of Articles | More Content, Copywriting Articles | Home

Know More About Our Services

Contact Us contact@contentwriter.in

Myths and Realities of Writing for the Web

 

Ever since it became popular, I have been hearing that writing for the Web is different from writing for print. I have always been skeptical of this assertion and now after years of experience I am certain that it is wrong. To paraphrase poet Gertrude Stein: "A text is a text is a text". Whether it is on a piece of paper or a computer screen is of little consequence. What makes a good text good is universal. It does not change because it is printed on paper or on a screen.

Let me demonstrate this by analyzing the plethora of articles that try to suggest otherwise.

The standard argument is that web readers are in a hurry, so they probably aren't going to read the entire article as they would in a print publication.

My background is journalism. I have been a writer with The Wall Street Journal and editor of a local daily newspaper. During my first course in journalism 40 years ago, the professor said something rather shocking: "Newspaper readers are in a hurry, so they probably aren't going to read your entire article."

This was very demoralizing, because we all believed that the objective of journalism was to write articles that people would read all the way through. Our egos were bruised. The professor, who knew what we were thinking, continued. "Our purpose is not for people to read everything we write, but to dispense useful information. As a writer, you are not the best judge of what is useful. Only the reader is."

If you think about it, this assertion should come as no surprise. When you start reading an article in a newspaper, how often do you actually finish it? Chances are not very often. News articles are specifically designed to help you decide how much you really need to read, so you can quickly go on to something else. If this weren't the case, people wouldn't read newspapers at all, because it would take them all day to do so.

The fact is, all these articles about writing for the web generally tell you what journalists have known for centuries. There may be some technical things about writing for the web that should be taken into account, just as there are about writing for print. However, good writing is good writing, so the differences pale into insignificance compared to the similarities.

To prove the point, here is a list of tips and recommendations proffered by these articles.

 

 

1. When you write for the web

you keep in mind that your readers probably aren't going to read your entire content as they would a print publication.

This statement, discussed above, is worth repeating because it is usually the "most important" thing these articles tell you. As we have just seen, it is nonsense. We could perhaps make a distinction between a daily newspaper and a weekly or monthly magazine. Magazine readers generally do have more time to read. Nevertheless, it still is not the objective of professional writers that people read their articles from beginning to end, because for the vast majority of readers doing so simply wouldn't be worth their while.


2. Limit Your Text To 600 - 700 Words Again, this statement is nonsense. There is no arbitrary limit to how many words people will read; that depends on the article and their interest in it.

Personally, I have stopped reading almost anything I find on the web that is less than 600 - 700 words, because such articles are generally shallow and prescriptive. So many of them offer a list of three, five or ten things you must do to achieve a particular objective. But they seldom give you sufficient (if any) explanation of why you should do them, other than because the writer says so.

Another argument asserts that you should limit yourself to only 600 - 700 words "because people don't like to read long texts on the screen". This is also fallacious. If people find an article sufficiently interesting but difficult to read on the screen, they will simply print it out and read it on paper.

3. Use Headings and Subheadings

The reason for this, we are told, is because web surfers like to read in "nuggets", i.e. small bits of text rather than long, flowing verbiage. This is a valid point. And is what newspapers and magazines have been doing for ever.

There is, however, a much more important reason for using headings and subheadings. They allow readers to pick and choose the information they want to read, which is also something newspapers and magazines have been doing for ever. Most good articles start off with an overview (the "lead" in journalese). The overall theme is then broken down into five or six sub-themes. As a reader, you may not be interested in exploring all of them, but only one or two in particular. The subheadings show you exactly where they are. In other words, you don't have to read everything in the article to find the particular information you are looking for. The subheadings lead you right to it.

4. Write Shorter Paragraphs

Again, look at newspapers and magazines. Long paragraphs are generally conspicuous by their absence. Occasionally, you will even find paragraphs as short as a single sentence. Why? The technical reason is to help the reader's eye to move comfortably down the page. A more important reason is that shorter paragraphs make it easier for readers to rapidly absorb what is written. Grammarians sometimes criticize newspapers and magazines for their illogical paragraphs. However, they make no pretence of being logical, but rather psychological.

It is true that search engines will more easily pick up your text if you consistently use shorter paragraphs. This is indeed specific to writing for the web and not to be neglected. However, since you should be writing this way anyhow, search engine optimization (SEO) becomes a bonus, not a raison d'ętre.

5. Write Tightly
In other words, eliminate unnecessary adjectives, adverbs, jargon, etc., that add nothing to meaning, but simply clutter the page. Duh! This is what professional newspaper and magazine writers do as a matter of course; otherwise, they wouldn't have a job.

Writing tightly also means eliminating anything that is not germane to the text. That odd fact you picked up or that cute anecdote may be very interesting. However, if they do not advance the purpose of your article, they become distractions. Get rid of them and save them for another article where they might really add something.

6. Put Key Information Up Front

"Because web users scan articles, you need to get out the basic tenants of your article in the beginning of the text." Duh!

Newspaper and magazine readers also scan articles. In fact, there is a journalistic technique called the "inverted pyramid" that specifically addresses this phenomenon. The inverted pyramid is like a triangle standing on its point. All the key information is put at the top (the "lead"), with detailed information filling in the rest of the pyramid (the "body) in descending order of importance.

By reading the first couple of paragraphs or so, you get a good overview of what the article is all about. You can then decide to continue reading or go on to something else. Moreover, because the information in the body is arranged in descending order of importance, you can stop reading at virtually any point you want in full confidence that you will not be missing something seriously important further down. Arranging information in descending order of importance makes the inverted pyramid extremely useful to readers and a major challenge to writers. Mastering the art of putting information into descending order of importance is a key attribute that distinguishes a professional writer (one who gets paid for writing) from an amateur.

In conclusion, note that this article runs to 1382 words.
If you have read this far, it is because you felt you were getting something of value. It is as short as it possibly could be while still saying everything that needed to be said. If it had been artificially restricted to 600 - 700 words, it would have been too short -- and most likely a terrible waste of your time.
 

Contributing Author: Philip Yaffe is a former reporter/feature writer with The Wall Street Journal and a marketing communication consultant. He currently teaches a course in good writing and good speaking in Brussels, Belgium. His recently published book In the “I” of the Storm: the Simple Secrets of Writing & Speaking (Almost) like a Professional is available from Story Publishers in Ghent, Belgium (storypublishers.be) and Amazon (amazon.com). For further information, contact: Philip Yaffe, Brussels, Belgium Email: phil.yaffe@yahoo.com ,phil.yaffe@gmail.com
 









 
Content Writing Services, India  

Sitemap

Home

 

Online Writing Job Profiles | Content Writer Blog |  Online Press Release | Writing Courses


contentwriter.in -
Affordable Website Content Writing, Article Submission Services
Copyright © 2005 - 2016 contentwriter.in, contact@contentwriter.in